Questions and health outcomes prioritization for the development of a COVID-19 dental clinical practice guideline: A case study

Primer Autor
Zaror, Carlos
Co-autores
Figueiredo Deana, Naira
Espinoza-Espinoza, Gerardo
Aravena-Rivas, Yanela
Munoz-Millan, Patricia
Pineda, Patricia
Burdiles, Pamela
Nahuelhual, Paula
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Título
Questions and health outcomes prioritization for the development of a COVID-19 dental clinical practice guideline: A case study
Editorial
WILEY
Revista
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Lenguaje
en
Resumen
Rationale, Aims and Objectives In the context of a pandemic, the rapid development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is critical. The guideline development process includes prioritization of the guideline topic, questions and health outcomes. This case study describes the application of a new methodology to prioritize questions and rate the importance of health outcomes for a COVID-19 dental guideline. Methods Panel members rated the topic and the questions' overall importance, using a 9-point scale (1 = least important, 9 = most important). In addition, they rated six criteria if multiple questions received the same overall importance rating: common in practice, uncertainty in practice, variation in practice, new evidence available, cost consequences, not previously addressed. Panellists also rated the importance of each outcome, defined with health outcome descriptors, using a 9-point scale and the utility of health outcomes on a visual analogue scale. The correlation between each criterion and overall question importance was tested by Spearman correlation coefficient. Results Of seven topics, four were rated as high priority and three were rated as important, but not of high priority. Thirty-six percent of the questions (18/50) were rated as high priority to address in the guideline and 64% (32/50) were rated as an important question but not of high priority. Of the 11 outcomes, 72.7% were rated as critical for decision making. The mean utility rating was 0.57 (SD 0.32), with a minimum mean rating of 0.16 and a maximum of 0.76 (SD 0.23). Conclusion This case study demonstrated that this approach provides a rigorous and transparent methodology to conduct the prioritizations of guideline topics, questions and health outcomes.
Tipo de Recurso
artículo original
Description
Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo, Chile, Grant/Award Number: COVID0700
doi
10.1111/jep.13658
Formato Recurso
PDF
Palabras Claves
COVID-19
evidence-based practice
healthcare outcomes
practice guideline
Ubicación del archivo
Categoría OCDE
Ciencias y Servicios de Atención Médica
Informática Médica
Medicina general e interna
Materias
COVID-19
práctica basada en evidencia
resultados de atención médica
guía de práctica
Título de la cita (Recomendado-único)
Questions and health outcomes prioritization for the development of a COVID-19 dental clinical practice guideline: A case study
Página de inicio (Recomendado-único)
404
Página final (Recomendado-único)
410
Identificador del recurso (Mandatado-único)
artículo original
Versión del recurso (Recomendado-único)
version publicada
Condición de la licencia (Recomendado-repetible)
0
Derechos de acceso
metadata
Access Rights
metadata
Referencia del Financiador (Mandatado si es aplicable-repetible)
ANID COVID0700
Id de Web of Science
WOS:000746849700001
Revisa las metricas alternativas de Almetrics
Revisa las citaciones de Dimensions