Repositorio
Institucional

Alvarez, Cristian

Delgado-Floody, Pedro

Soriano-Maldonado, Alberto

Rodriguez-Perez, Manuel A.

Angel Latorre-Roman, Pedro

Martinez-Salazar, Cristian

Andrea Vargas, Claudia

Caamano-Navarrete, Felipe

Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel

The Effects of Two Different Concurrent Training Configurations on Markers of Metabolic Syndrome and Fitness in Women With Severe/Morbid Obesity: A Randomised Controlled Trial

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY

en

Concurrent training (CT), characterised by combining both aerobic and resistance training modalities within the same session, is recognised to improve metabolic syndrome (MetS) markers, but little is known about the effects of different configurations (i.e., order) of these exercise modalities on MetS markers and the interindividual responses. The purpose of the present study was to describe the effects, and the interindividual variability, of 20 weeks of two CT configurations (i.e., high intensity interval training (HIIT) plus resistance training (RT), compared with RT plus HIIT) in women with severe/morbid obesity. Overall, 26 women with severe/morbid obesity were assigned either to HIIT + RT [n = 14, mean and 95%CI, 45.79 (40.74, 50.83) or RT + HIIT (n = 12), 33.6 (25.30, 41.79) years]. MetS-related outcomes were waist circumference (WC, cm), systolic (SBP, mmHg) and diastolic (DBP, mmHg) blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), triglycerides (Tg), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Secondary outcomes were other anthropometrics, body composition, lipids, muscle strength, and the six-minute walk test (6Mwt). There were significant differences in the prevalence of nonresponders (NRs) only for WC comparing HIIT + RT 2 (18.1%) vs. RT + HIIT group 5 (50.0%), p < 0.0001, but not for SBP 4 (27.2%) vs. 4 (40.0%), DBP 8 (72.7%) vs. 7 (70.0%), FPG 8 (72.7%) vs. 9 (90.0%), HDL-c 7 (63.6%) vs. 8 (80.0%), and Tg 7 (63.6%) vs. 8 (80.0%), all p > 0.05. Additionally, the RT + HIIT group showed significant reductions in WC (Delta -3.84 cm, p = 0.015), SBP (Delta -8.46 mmHg, p = 0.040), whereas the HIIT+RT group elicited significant reductions only in SBP (Delta -8.43 mmHg, p = 0.022). The HIIT + RT promoted a lower prevalence of NRs than the RT + HIIT configuration on WC, and overall, there were slightly more beneficial training-induced effects on markers of MetS in the RT + HIIT group compared to the HIIT + RT group.

artículo original

10.3389/fphys.2021.694798

PDF

concurrent training

morbid obesity

exercise training

metabolic syndrome

exercise order

interindividual variability

DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL

SESSION EXERCISE SEQUENCE

NEUROMUSCULAR ADAPTATIONS

STRENGTH

RESISTANCE

GUIDELINES

MANAGEMENT

PLASMA

HEALTH

Fisiología

entrenamiento concurrente

obesidad mórbida

entrenamiento con ejercicio

síndrome metabólico

orden de ejercicio

variabilidad interindividual

DENSIDAD-COLESTEROL LIPOPROTEÍNA

SESIÓN SECUENCIA DE EJERCICIO

ADAPTACIONES NEUROMUSCULARES

FUERZA

RESISTENCIA

GUÍAS

MANEJO

PLASMA

SALUD

Ciencias del Deporte y Acondicionamiento Físico

Endocrinología y Metabolismo

Fisiología

The Effects of Two Different Concurrent Training Configurations on Markers of Metabolic Syndrome and Fitness in Women With Severe/Morbid Obesity: A Randomised Controlled Trial

artículo original

version publicada

CC BY 4.0

CC BY 4.0

acceso abierto

acceso abierto

WOS:000764005200001