Repositorio UFRO · Omeka S

The importance of considering human well-being to understand social preferences of ecosystem services

Primer Autor	Meli, Paula
Co-autores	Vieli, Lorena Spirito, Florencia Reyes-Riveros, Rosa Gonzalez-Suhr, Carolina Altamirano, Adison
Título	The importance of considering human well-being to understand social preferences of ecosystem services
Editorial	ELSEVIER GMBH
Revista	JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION
Lenguaje	en
Resumen	Evaluations about social preferences for ecosystem services do not always include human well-being. Using a case study in South-Central Chile, we showed how the human well-being approach might reveal social preferences on ecosystem services. We used a socio-cultural approach to compare social preferences for provisioning, regulating, and cultural services and the links people establish to human well-being. From an online questionnaire, we collected 214 responses, balanced in gender (49/51 % men/women, respectively), diverse in age (18 to 62 years), but with 68 % under 30 years. Water for human consumption and agriculture, food, and native forest products were the most preferred provisioning services (40, 28, and 21 %, respectively). In contrast, products from tree plantations were considered the lowest ones. Pollution control (40 %) and water provision during summer (18 %) were the preferred regulating services, while biodiversity conservation (25 %) and environmental education (22 %) were primarily selected cultural ones. We found a clear preference pattern for provisioning services but not for regulating and cultural services. Even though people linked multiple ES to human well-being, some links' patterns mirrored preferences for provisioning services but not for regulating and cultural services. However, although cultural services did not show a clear preference pattern, people perceived their importance by linking them to various benefits. Understanding social preferences of ES based on their links with human well-being helps to address their relevance and potential trade-offs for land planning and management decision-making and convert the ES concept into decision-making instruments.
Fecha Publicación	2023
Tipo de Recurso	artículo original
doi	10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126344
Formato Recurso	PDF
Palabras Claves	Benefits Cascade model Cultural services Ecosystem functions Ecosystem services valuation Socio-cultural valuation
Ubicación del archivo	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126344
Categoría OCDE	Biodiversidad y Conservación Ciencias Ambientales y Ecología
Materias	Beneficios modelo en cascada Servicios culturales Funciones del ecosistema Valoración de servicios ecosistémicos Valoración sociocultural
Identificador del recurso (Mandatado-único)	artículo original
Versión del recurso (Recomendado-único)	versión publicada
Derechos de acceso	metadata
Access Rights	metadata
Id de Web of Science	WOS:000924321000001
ISSN	1617-1381
Tipo de ruta	hibrida
Categoría WOS	Biodiversidad y Conservación Ciencias Ambientales y Ecología
Referencia del Financiador (Mandatado si es aplicable-repetible)	ANID 11191021 ANID 1171445 ANID 1211051)