The importance of considering human well-being to understand social preferences of ecosystem services
| Primer Autor |
Meli, Paula
|
| Co-autores |
Vieli, Lorena
Spirito, Florencia
Reyes-Riveros, Rosa
Gonzalez-Suhr, Carolina
Altamirano, Adison
|
| Título |
The importance of considering human well-being to understand social preferences of ecosystem services
|
| Editorial |
ELSEVIER GMBH
|
| Revista |
JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION
|
| Lenguaje |
en
|
| Resumen |
Evaluations about social preferences for ecosystem services do not always include human well-being. Using a case study in South-Central Chile, we showed how the human well-being approach might reveal social preferences on ecosystem services. We used a socio-cultural approach to compare social preferences for provisioning, regulating, and cultural services and the links people establish to human well-being. From an online questionnaire, we collected 214 responses, balanced in gender (49/51 % men/women, respectively), diverse in age (18 to 62 years), but with 68 % under 30 years. Water for human consumption and agriculture, food, and native forest products were the most preferred provisioning services (40, 28, and 21 %, respectively). In contrast, products from tree plantations were considered the lowest ones. Pollution control (40 %) and water provision during summer (18 %) were the preferred regulating services, while biodiversity conservation (25 %) and environmental education (22 %) were primarily selected cultural ones. We found a clear preference pattern for provisioning services but not for regulating and cultural services. Even though people linked multiple ES to human well-being, some links' patterns mirrored preferences for provisioning services but not for regulating and cultural services. However, although cultural services did not show a clear preference pattern, people perceived their importance by linking them to various benefits. Understanding social preferences of ES based on their links with human well-being helps to address their relevance and potential trade-offs for land planning and management decision-making and convert the ES concept into decision-making instruments.
|
| Fecha Publicación |
2023
|
| Tipo de Recurso |
artículo original
|
| doi |
10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126344
|
| Formato Recurso |
PDF
|
| Palabras Claves |
Benefits
Cascade model
Cultural services
Ecosystem functions
Ecosystem services valuation
Socio-cultural valuation
|
| Ubicación del archivo | |
| Categoría OCDE |
Biodiversidad y Conservación
Ciencias Ambientales y Ecología
|
| Materias |
Beneficios
modelo en cascada
Servicios culturales
Funciones del ecosistema
Valoración de servicios ecosistémicos
Valoración sociocultural
|
| Identificador del recurso (Mandatado-único) |
artículo original
|
| Versión del recurso (Recomendado-único) |
versión publicada
|
| Derechos de acceso |
metadata
|
| Access Rights |
metadata
|
| Id de Web of Science |
WOS:000924321000001
|
| ISSN |
1617-1381
|
| Tipo de ruta |
hibrida
|
| Categoría WOS |
Biodiversidad y Conservación
Ciencias Ambientales y Ecología
|
| Referencia del Financiador (Mandatado si es aplicable-repetible) |
ANID 11191021
ANID 1171445
ANID 1211051)
|
cienciaabierta.ufro.cl
ciencia.abierta@ufrontera.cl