Selective Effect of Different High-Intensity Running Protocols on Resistance Training Performance
| Primer Autor |
Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
|
| Co-autores |
Garcia-Pinillos, Felipe
Miras-Moreno, Sergio
Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
Garcia-Ramos, Amador
Ruiz-Alias, Santiago A.
|
| Título |
Selective Effect of Different High-Intensity Running Protocols on Resistance Training Performance
|
| Editorial |
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
|
| Revista |
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
|
| Lenguaje |
en
|
| Resumen |
Perez-Castilla, A, Garcia-Pinillos, F, Miras-Moreno, S, Ramirez-Campillo, R, Garcia-Ramos, A, and Ruiz-Alias, SA. Selective effect of different high-intensity running protocols on resistance training performance. J Strength Cond Res 37(6): e369-e375, 2023-This study aimed to explore the acute effect of 2 high-intensity running protocols (high-intensity interval training [HIIT] and sprint interval training [SIT]) on resistance training (RT) performance and their combined effect on the lower-body maximal neuromuscular capacities. Eighteen healthy subjects randomly completed 3 experimental protocols: only RT, HIIT + RT, and SIT + RT. Characteristics of the RT protocol include 3 back-squat sets of 10 repetitions or 20% velocity loss against 60% of 1 repetition maximum with 3 minutes of interset rest. Characteristics of the high-intensity running protocols include HIIT (4 intervals of 4 minutes at similar to 110% of functional threshold power with 3 minutes of interinterval rest) and SIT (6 all-out sprints of 30 seconds with 4 minutes and 24 seconds of interinterval rest). The force-velocity relationship (maximal values of force [F-0], velocity [v(0)], and power [P-max]) was evaluated at the beginning and at the end of each experimental protocol. The number of back-squat repetitions (p = 0.006, effect size [ES] = -0.96), fastest velocity (p = 0.003, ES = -0.63), and average velocity (p = 0.001, ES = -0.73) were lower for the SIT + RT protocol compared with the RT protocol, but no significant differences were observed between the RT and HIIT + RT (p >= T0.057, ES <=.-0.46, except -0.82 for the number of back-squat repetitions) and HIIT + RT and SIT + RT (p >= T0.091, ES .0-0.35) protocols. The 3 protocols induced comparable decreases in v(0) and P-max (F-(2,F-34) 2,0.96, p >= 0.393), but F-0 tended to decrease after the SIT + RT protocol and to increase after the RT and HIIT + RT protocols (F-(2,F-34) = 4.37, p = 0.035). Compared with RT alone, the data suggest that SIT deteriorates RT quality and F-0 capacity more than long-interval HIIT.
|
| Fecha Publicación |
2023
|
| Tipo de Recurso |
artículo original
|
| doi |
10.1519/JSC.0000000000004392
|
| Formato Recurso |
PDF
|
| Palabras Claves |
high-intensity interval training
human physical conditioning
muscle strength
musculoskeletal and neural physiological phenomena
physical fitness
|
| Ubicación del archivo | |
| Categoría OCDE |
Ciencias del Deporte
|
| Materias |
Entrenamiento por intervalos de alta intensidad
condicionamiento físico humano
fuerza muscular
fenómenos fisiológicos musculoesqueléticos y neurales
aptitud física
|
| Página final (Recomendado-único) |
E375
|
| Identificador del recurso (Mandatado-único) |
artículo original
|
| Versión del recurso (Recomendado-único) |
versión publicada
|
| Derechos de acceso |
metadata
|
| Access Rights |
metadata
|
| Id de Web of Science |
WOS:000995733600002
|
| ISSN |
1064-8011
|
| Categoría WOS |
Ciencias del Deporte
|
| Referencia del Financiador (Mandatado si es aplicable-repetible) |
AEI PID2020-115600RB-C21
|
cienciaabierta.ufro.cl
ciencia.abierta@ufrontera.cl