Constant-Murley Score: systematic review and standardized evaluation in different shoulder pathologies

Primer Autor
Vrotsou, Kalliopi
Co-autores
Avila, Monica#Machon, Monica#Mateo-Abad, Maider#Pardo, Yolanda#Garin, Olatz#Zaror, Carlos#Gonzalez, Nerea#Escobar, Antonio#Cuellar, Ricardo
Título
Constant-Murley Score: systematic review and standardized evaluation in different shoulder pathologies
Editorial
SPRINGER
Revista
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Lenguaje
en
Resumen
Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) in various shoulder pathologies, based on a systematic review and expert standardized evaluations. Methods A systematic review was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and finally the included articles were grouped according to patients' pathologies. Two expert evaluators independently assessed the CMS properties of reliability, validity, responsiveness to change, interpretability and burden score in each group, using the EMPRO (Evaluating Measures of Patient Reported Outcomes) tool. The CMS properties were assessed per attribute and overall for each considered group. Only the concept and measurement model was assessed globally. Results Five individual pathologies (i.e. subacromial, fractures, arthritis, instability and frozen shoulder) and two additional groups (i.e. various pathologies and healthy subjects) were considered. Overall EMPRO scores ranged from 58.6 for subacromial to 30.6 points for instability. Responsiveness to change was the only quality to obtain at least 50 points across all groups, but for frozen shoulder. Insufficient information was obtained in relation to the concept and measurement model and great variability was seen in the other evaluated attributes. Conclusions The current evidence does not support the CMS as a gold standard in shoulder evaluation. Its use is advisable for subacromial pathology, but data are inconclusive for other shoulder conditions. Prospective studies exploring the psychometric properties of the scale, particularly for fractures, arthritis, instability and frozen shoulder are needed.
Tipo de Recurso
Artículo de revisión
Description
This study was funded by the Health Department of the Basque Country Government (No.: 2013111087). The funding source was not involved in any phase of the current project.
Este estudio fue financiado por el Departamento de Salud del Gobierno Vasco (n.º: 2013111087). La fuente de financiación no participó en ninguna fase del proyecto actual.
doi
10.1007/s11136-018-1875-7
Formato Recurso
pdf
Palabras Claves
Constant-Murley score# Systematic review# Shoulder pathologies# EMPRO tool# Standardized evaluation# Psychometric properties
Ubicación del archivo
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1875-7
Categoría OCDE
Health Care Sciences & Services# Health Policy & Services# Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Materias
puntuación de Constant-Murley# Revisión sistemática# Patologías del hombro# herramienta EMPRO# Evaluación estandarizada# Propiedades psicométricas
Disciplinas de la OCDE
Ortopedia
Otros Temas de Medicina Clínica
Servicios y Cuidados en Ciencias de la Salud
Id de Web of Science
WOS:000442862200001
Título de la cita (Recomendado-único)
Constant-Murley Score: systematic review and standardized evaluation in different shoulder pathologies
Identificador del recurso (Mandatado-único)
Artículo de revisión
Versión del recurso (Recomendado-único)
version publicada
Editorial
SPRINGER
Revista/Libro
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Categoría WOS
Ciencias y Servicios de Atención Médica# Políticas y servicios de salud# Salud pública, ambiental y ocupacional
ISSN
0962-9343
Idioma
en
Referencia del Financiador (Mandatado si es aplicable-repetible)
Gobierno Vasco 2013111087
Descripción
This study was funded by the Health Department of the Basque Country Government (No.: 2013111087). The funding source was not involved in any phase of the current project.
Formato
pdf
Tipo de ruta
hibrida
Access Rights
restringido
Derechos de acceso
restringido
Página de inicio (Recomendado-único)
78
Página final (Recomendado-único)
81
Revisa las metricas alternativas de Almetrics
Revisa las citaciones de Dimensions